From george at galis.org Wed Mar 1 21:03:30 2006 From: george at galis.org (George Georgalis) Date: Wed Mar 1 21:03:36 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] Goldman jobs... Message-ID: <20060302020330.GC24046@sta.duo> I know a few on this list may be interested.... George, I hope all is well. I'm touching base because I need your help. Goldman is holding an open house next Tuesday, to hire several mission control production support consultants that can do Unix scripting. It is a long term contract paying 75-80 hr. It is a mission control, high pressure, trading system environment. They need people to 'put-out fires' quickly. If you know anybody like this, I would like to introduce myself to them. Thanks. And if you know anybody else in the IT field looking, please let me know as well. if interested let me know and I'll forward the recruiter's;s contact, my contact with this recruiter has been positive. // George -- George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator < http://galis.org/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george@galis.org From ike at lesmuug.org Thu Mar 2 13:04:56 2006 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Thu Mar 2 13:05:01 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] Apple Intel Servers? Message-ID: <80D39B12-5427-400D-8B2D-8E7B8ABA7370@lesmuug.org> Hey Okan, All, An officially relevant cross-post, (are they outlawed alltogether?) Last night at NYCBUG Okan was asking me about Intel Apple stuff, and weather or not it uses Open Firmware. -- I checked today to try to answer your question about Open Firmware on upcoming Intel Apple Servers, and there is no such thing as an Intel Apple Server (yet?). With that, http://appleintelfaq.com/#17 "Shipping Intel-based Macintosh computers use Intel's new Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI)[17.1]." Suck. Or mabye not- it's just new. I'll miss Open Firmware, it's easy and well documented, it's Cisco- admin-friendly (it came from Sun back in the day), it's all FORTH syntax based. :( Rocket- .ike From pete at nomadlogic.org Thu Mar 2 10:13:23 2006 From: pete at nomadlogic.org (Pete Wright) Date: Thu Mar 2 13:14:25 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] Apple Intel Servers? In-Reply-To: <80D39B12-5427-400D-8B2D-8E7B8ABA7370@lesmuug.org> References: <80D39B12-5427-400D-8B2D-8E7B8ABA7370@lesmuug.org> Message-ID: <20060302181323.GA20140@snax.spimageworks.com> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 01:04:56PM -0500, Isaac Levy wrote: > Hey Okan, All, > > An officially relevant cross-post, (are they outlawed alltogether?) > > Last night at NYCBUG Okan was asking me about Intel Apple stuff, and > weather or not it uses Open Firmware. > > -- > I checked today to try to answer your question about Open Firmware on > upcoming Intel Apple Servers, and there is no such thing as an Intel > Apple Server (yet?). > > With that, > > http://appleintelfaq.com/#17 > > "Shipping Intel-based Macintosh computers use Intel's new Extensible > Firmware Interface (EFI)[17.1]." > > Suck. Or mabye not- it's just new. > I'll miss Open Firmware, it's easy and well documented, it's Cisco- > admin-friendly (it came from Sun back in the day), it's all FORTH > syntax based. > i vaugly remember reading about how the mac/intel firmware may be coming from the itanium family. i've never used itanium, or an intel based mac for that matter, but that was the impression i got from a freebsd dev a while back.... -p -- ~~oO00Oo~~ Peter Wright pete@nomadlogic.org www.nomadlogic.org/~pete 917.415.9866 From george at sddi.net Thu Mar 2 20:15:00 2006 From: george at sddi.net (George R.) Date: Thu Mar 2 20:15:10 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] MacBook review. . . Message-ID: <44079894.3010403@sddi.net> I'm sure many of you have seen it. . . http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/macbookpro.ars It is an enjoyable and useful review. . . from the performance and compatibility issues all the way to the 'feeling' issues that are so important on Macs, IMHO. Particularly liked that she included the hacked Dell Inspiron. Any thoughts anyone has on this? As much as I would love to get one, I'm waiting on the next series of them. I'm sure the battery life will get a leap. And I'm curious to see the potential security implications of the Intel chip. g From jschauma at netmeister.org Sun Mar 5 10:53:36 2006 From: jschauma at netmeister.org (Jan Schaumann) Date: Sun Mar 5 10:47:57 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup Message-ID: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> Hi all, So how are people doing regular automated backups of their HFS and HFS+ filesystems? I set up amanda, but notice that dump(8) can't dump these partitions. tar(8) doesn't preserve resource forks. So Apple ships their BSD derived OS with tools that can't backup the normal standard filesystem. Brilliant. (Does dump(8) even dump apple UFS filesystems?) Does Mac OS X have other tools that can create a proper backup of a filesystem? I've found hfstar and hfspax, which seem suitable for the task. Anybody using these? -Jan -- Wenn ich tot bin, mir soll mal Einer mit Auferstehung oder so kommen, ich hau ihm eine rein! (Anonym) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://berdom.net/pipermail/macosx-unix/attachments/20060305/8c2cfbcd/attachment.bin From jared at 23x.net Sun Mar 5 17:11:56 2006 From: jared at 23x.net (Jared ''Danger'' Earle) Date: Sun Mar 5 11:12:02 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup In-Reply-To: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> References: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> Message-ID: On 5 Mar 2006, at 16:53, Jan Schaumann wrote: > tar(8) doesn't preserve resource forks. Yes it does. http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/unix/ HFS+ CLI file commands Use command-line commands safely on HFS+ files. Utilities such as cp, mv, tar, rsync now use the same standard APIs as Spotlight and access control lists to handle resource forks properly. -- Jared Earle, Nightfall Games, jared@23x.net - http://www.23x.net "Smell the fragrance of the feathers of the angel of SPORK!" From jschauma at netmeister.org Sun Mar 5 11:27:20 2006 From: jschauma at netmeister.org (Jan Schaumann) Date: Sun Mar 5 11:21:34 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup In-Reply-To: References: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> Message-ID: <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> Jared ''Danger'' Earle wrote: > On 5 Mar 2006, at 16:53, Jan Schaumann wrote: > >tar(8) doesn't preserve resource forks. > > Yes it does. > > http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/unix/ > > HFS+ CLI file commands > Use command-line commands safely on HFS+ files. Utilities such as cp, > mv, tar, rsync now use the same standard APIs as Spotlight and access > control lists to handle resource forks properly. Hey, I stand corrected. That's good news. Was that always the case? I seem to remember a tar that did not. Maybe I'm just misremembering something. But why didn't they make dump(8) work, then, too? -Jan -- Free Speech Online - Stop Internet Censorship --- Electronic Frontier Foundation -- http://www.eff.org --- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://berdom.net/pipermail/macosx-unix/attachments/20060305/70f4c84d/attachment.bin From jared at 23x.net Sun Mar 5 17:33:05 2006 From: jared at 23x.net (Jared ''Danger'' Earle) Date: Sun Mar 5 11:33:13 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup In-Reply-To: <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> References: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> Message-ID: On 5 Mar 2006, at 17:27, Jan Schaumann wrote: > Hey, I stand corrected. That's good news. Was that always the > case? I > seem to remember a tar that did not. Maybe I'm just misremembering > something. This is new with 10.4 so you're not misremembering. > But why didn't they make dump(8) work, then, too? Because it's very, very broken? -- Jared Earle, Nightfall Games, jared@23x.net - http://www.23x.net "Toss the SPORK! Toss the SPORK! And travel back through time with the aid of chance." From ike at lesmuug.org Sun Mar 5 17:03:22 2006 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Sun Mar 5 17:03:35 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup In-Reply-To: References: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> Message-ID: <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> Hi Jan, On Mar 5, 2006, at 11:33 AM, Jared ''Danger'' Earle wrote: > On 5 Mar 2006, at 17:27, Jan Schaumann wrote: > >> But why didn't they make dump(8) work, then, too? > > Because it's very, very broken? I don't officially know what Apple's 'best practices' are for dump type backups here, but the functionality you are looking for is historically handled by making disk images - (or, file-backed memory disks, in the *BSD world). With that, disk images can be manipulated from the cli using hdiutil (1), and from the Finder using 'Disk Utility.app'. One can restore entire disks from disk images using the Apple installer tools, etc... The disk images can be encrypted, (AES), you can make sparse disk images, whatever. It's all pretty mature at this point. I've used disk images on apple for many years, in many contexts and applications, and I find them really delightful to work with- ease and maturity for the user design that I miss on other platforms. -- Just my .02? here, I'm not sure if your looking for an 'Apple Solution' for backups here, or just trying to get Amanda to work... As an aside, this article explains how to get Amanda working, using Apple UFS formatted volumes, not sure if it's useful for you or not: https://webserver.brandeis.edu/pages/view/Bio/AmandaMacOSXCompileNotes -- As another aside, Bacula seems to have a much larger group of OSX platform users: http://www.bacula.org/ I don't use either, I'm just regurgitating what I understand from seeing Dan Langille lecture about Bacula- I hope my rambling helps more than confuses the subject. Best, .ike From jschauma at netmeister.org Sun Mar 5 17:23:36 2006 From: jschauma at netmeister.org (Jan Schaumann) Date: Sun Mar 5 17:17:54 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup In-Reply-To: <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> References: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> Message-ID: <20060305222336.GA8126@netmeister.org> Isaac Levy wrote: > With that, disk images can be manipulated from the cli using hdiutil > (1), and from the Finder using 'Disk Utility.app'. Yes, I thought of that, too. But we currently do use amanda for all backups, so finding a tool that works with amanda is the objective. If tar(1) now understands resource forks et al, then that should work. On the other hand, I wonder if I could simply stream a .dmg back to amanda. Hmmm... > Just my .02? here, I'm not sure if your looking for an 'Apple > Solution' for backups here, or just trying to get Amanda to work... Yupp, that's what I need. I'd prefer to find a solution and not Yet Another Gruesome Hack To Make OS X Do What I Need. :) > As an aside, this article explains how to get Amanda working, using > Apple UFS formatted volumes, not sure if it's useful for you or not: > https://webserver.brandeis.edu/pages/view/Bio/AmandaMacOSXCompileNotes Sorry, the filesystems in question are HFS(+). > As another aside, Bacula seems to have a much larger group of OSX > platform users: > http://www.bacula.org/ Yes, bacula. I have been meaning to take a serious look at this, for a number of reasons. But then, amanda is currently working (FSVO ``working'') and I'm not too keen on switching my entire backup system at this point. -Jan -- http://www.ncadp.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://berdom.net/pipermail/macosx-unix/attachments/20060305/7fc68dd2/attachment.bin From ike at lesmuug.org Sun Mar 5 19:21:02 2006 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Sun Mar 5 19:21:15 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup In-Reply-To: <20060305222336.GA8126@netmeister.org> References: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> <20060305222336.GA8126@netmeister.org> Message-ID: <2EDE8D2B-7E66-4207-B3A1-CCC08243589B@lesmuug.org> Hi Jan, On Mar 5, 2006, at 5:23 PM, Jan Schaumann wrote: > Isaac Levy wrote: > >> With that, disk images can be manipulated from the cli using hdiutil >> (1), and from the Finder using 'Disk Utility.app'. > > Yes, I thought of that, too. But we currently do use amanda for all > backups, so finding a tool that works with amanda is the > objective. If > tar(1) now understands resource forks et al, then that should work. > > On the other hand, I wonder if I could simply stream a .dmg back to > amanda. Hmmm... I bet you could- pipes work on Darwin/OSX :) I somehow seem to remember tons of hdiutil(1) scripters posting all kinds of goodies on , including simple network backups, etc... > >> Just my .02? here, I'm not sure if your looking for an 'Apple >> Solution' for backups here, or just trying to get Amanda to work... > > Yupp, that's what I need. I'd prefer to find a solution and not Yet > Another Gruesome Hack To Make OS X Do What I Need. :) Uh-oh- what kind of gruesome hacks? :) > >> As an aside, this article explains how to get Amanda working, using >> Apple UFS formatted volumes, not sure if it's useful for you or not: >> https://webserver.brandeis.edu/pages/view/Bio/ >> AmandaMacOSXCompileNotes > > Sorry, the filesystems in question are HFS(+). Dig. Yeah. > >> As another aside, Bacula seems to have a much larger group of OSX >> platform users: >> http://www.bacula.org/ > > Yes, bacula. I have been meaning to take a serious look at this, > for a > number of reasons. But then, amanda is currently working (FSVO > ``working'') and I'm not too keen on switching my entire backup system > at this point. /me sighs Off topic, is there some feature/working reason that Amanda actually saves you time, or helps you backup systems in your enviornment? i.e. is it a scale thing, lots of machines? Just curious- Rocket- .ike From jschauma at netmeister.org Sun Mar 5 22:41:23 2006 From: jschauma at netmeister.org (Jan Schaumann) Date: Sun Mar 5 22:35:39 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup In-Reply-To: <2EDE8D2B-7E66-4207-B3A1-CCC08243589B@lesmuug.org> References: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> <20060305222336.GA8126@netmeister.org> <2EDE8D2B-7E66-4207-B3A1-CCC08243589B@lesmuug.org> Message-ID: <20060306034123.GB22236@netmeister.org> Isaac Levy wrote: > On Mar 5, 2006, at 5:23 PM, Jan Schaumann wrote: > >Yupp, that's what I need. I'd prefer to find a solution and not Yet > >Another Gruesome Hack To Make OS X Do What I Need. :) > > Uh-oh- what kind of gruesome hacks? :) Oh, nothing in particular. I've just been frustrated with a number of issues since I've found myself responsible for a lab of those Mac OS X things. In particular, commercial applications seem to always assume that the person wanting to run the app is necessarily an administrator and can write to, say, /Library/Preferences or /Application/ or whatever. I've been ktracing through almost all big add-on applications. OS X really does not play all that well in a heterogenous multi-user network. As somebody else said, Apple makes things really easy, as long as they anticipate what you may want to do. The things they did not anticipate you might want to do are often incredibly cumbersome, if not impossible. > Off topic, is there some feature/working reason that Amanda actually > saves you time, or helps you backup systems in your enviornment? > i.e. is it a scale thing, lots of machines? Just curious- Well, we currently back up about 1.3 TB from three NetBSD servers, a Linux and an IRIX server via amanda to a NetBSD backup host. Adding the 200 GB (at the moment) from the Mac OS X server would not be a problem as far as the tape library is concerned, so I was hoping for a simple ``install amanda on OS X, add host/disk to config, done'' solution. So far I've gotten to ``install amanda on OS X, add host/disk to config''. The ``done'' part is what usually proves to be the tricky one. -Jan -- Free Speech Online - Stop Internet Censorship --- Electronic Frontier Foundation -- http://www.eff.org --- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://berdom.net/pipermail/macosx-unix/attachments/20060305/11da28ca/attachment.bin From george at galis.org Mon Mar 6 16:29:09 2006 From: george at galis.org (George Georgalis) Date: Mon Mar 6 16:29:18 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] Re: amanda backup In-Reply-To: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> References: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> Message-ID: <20060306212909.GC8283@sta.duo> On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:53:36AM -0500, Jan Schaumann wrote: >Hi all, > >So how are people doing regular automated backups of their HFS and HFS+ >filesystems? I set up amanda, but notice that dump(8) can't dump these >partitions. tar(8) doesn't preserve resource forks. So Apple ships >their BSD derived OS with tools that can't backup the normal standard >filesystem. Brilliant. (Does dump(8) even dump apple UFS >filesystems?) > >Does Mac OS X have other tools that can create a proper backup of a >filesystem? well this thread has a lotta stuff I never use, but my solution has been rsync -ah --delete --link-dest=$LAST_DATE source/ backup/$NEW_DATE/ (options from memory). So when you do a backup, each NEW_DATE directory has a full copy of the source, however hardlinks are made for files that didn't change since the last run. You probably want to use --numeric-ids and root, if you are backing up a system to a separate system. Or you can use single user if that's all you're interested in. I've not experimented with consumption of hardlinks, not sure if that is an issue with HFS+ but they may be something to watch out for. When you're setup, you can do full backups quite frequently with nominal resources. // George -- George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator < http://galis.org/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george@galis.org From george at galis.org Tue Mar 7 13:34:13 2006 From: george at galis.org (George Georgalis) Date: Tue Mar 7 13:34:16 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] new jobs... Message-ID: <20060307183413.GB9318@sta.duo> Folks, I told this recruiter to use jobs@list.nysa.org and subscribe with jobs-subscribe@list.nysa.org he'll probably repost with contact there.... though BOFH might not be a bad place to admin. :) // George George, (Thanks for the other ref) I hope all is well. I need your help. I'm looking for several Program Trading Linux/Unix SA's. It is a contract-to-hire role @ BOFA. It is paying 85hr. Let me know who I can introduce myself to. Right to hire linux / unix SA. pay 85/hr must have one or all of the business experience 1. Equity 2. Program trading 3. Electronic trading 4. Ecommerce 5. Tradefloor Former development experience strongly prefered. -- George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator < http://galis.org/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george@galis.org From george at galis.org Wed Mar 15 11:29:45 2006 From: george at galis.org (George Georgalis) Date: Wed Mar 15 11:29:50 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] looking for mac-winscp Message-ID: <20060315162945.GA12397@sta.duo> Has anyone here used winscp? It is quite a bit more than the openssh scp command. Anyway, we (here at $WORK) are looking to turn off the Samba protocol entirely on the local network. While the workstations here are mostly M$, there is a plan to switch over to Mac; but for the time being, mine is one of two computers running Mac. In the past, I've setup the apple file share protocol (nettalk I think it's called) but I'd prefer not starting a new service just as another is being taken down. NFS is not an option as more authentication is needed than that provides. So in a nutshell, winscp is a perfect solution but it doesn't run on Mac, as far as I can tell. Is anybody using something similar to get authenticated, browsable, gui file sharing? I'm happy to use command line or the finder to access the files, but command line scp is not enough, I need a mounted filesystem or virtually that. // George -- George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator < http://galis.org/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george@galis.org From bschonhorst at vcsnyc.org Wed Mar 15 12:13:28 2006 From: bschonhorst at vcsnyc.org (Brad Schonhorst) Date: Wed Mar 15 12:13:33 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] looking for mac-winscp In-Reply-To: <20060315162945.GA12397@sta.duo> References: <20060315162945.GA12397@sta.duo> Message-ID: On Mar 15, 2006, at 11:29 AM, George Georgalis wrote: > Has anyone here used winscp? It is quite a bit more than the > openssh scp command. > > Anyway, we (here at $WORK) are looking to turn off the Samba > protocol entirely on the local network. While the workstations > here are mostly M$, there is a plan to switch over to Mac; but for > the time being, mine is one of two computers running Mac. > > In the past, I've setup the apple file share protocol (nettalk > I think it's called) but I'd prefer not starting a new service > just as another is being taken down. NFS is not an option as more > authentication is needed than that provides. > > So in a nutshell, winscp is a perfect solution but it doesn't run > on Mac, as far as I can tell. Is anybody using something similar > to get authenticated, browsable, gui file sharing? I'm happy to > use command line or the finder to access the files, but command > line scp is not enough, I need a mounted filesystem or virtually > that. > > Hey George- I am not sure I understand exactly what you are looking for but if its a GUI frontend to run on a mac for ssh/scp then fugu might be worth trying: http://rsug.itd.umich.edu/software/fugu/ -brad ------------------------------------- Brad Schonhorst Network Administrator Village Community School From george at galis.org Wed Mar 15 13:27:30 2006 From: george at galis.org (George Georgalis) Date: Wed Mar 15 13:27:33 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] looking for mac-winscp In-Reply-To: References: <20060315162945.GA12397@sta.duo> Message-ID: <20060315182730.GB12397@sta.duo> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:13:28PM -0500, Brad Schonhorst wrote: >I am not sure I understand exactly what you are looking for but if >its a GUI frontend to run on a mac for ssh/scp then fugu might be >worth trying: > >http://rsug.itd.umich.edu/software/fugu/ per the screen shots, that looks exactly what I'm looking for. Thanks, // George -- George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator < http://galis.org/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george@galis.org From ike at lesmuug.org Wed Mar 15 13:27:43 2006 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Wed Mar 15 13:28:01 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] looking for mac-winscp In-Reply-To: References: <20060315162945.GA12397@sta.duo> Message-ID: <8A76B8A9-4B8D-41E7-AA1E-8CE4A9B56B3A@lesmuug.org> On Mar 15, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Brad Schonhorst wrote: >> So in a nutshell, winscp is a perfect solution but it doesn't run >> on Mac, as far as I can tell. Is anybody using something similar >> to get authenticated, browsable, gui file sharing? I'm happy to >> use command line or the finder to access the files, but command >> line scp is not enough, I need a mounted filesystem or virtually >> that. >> >> > > Hey George- > > I am not sure I understand exactly what you are looking for but if > its a GUI frontend to run on a mac for ssh/scp then fugu might be > worth trying: > > http://rsug.itd.umich.edu/software/fugu/ > > > -brad I'll second Fugu. Rocket- .ike From george at galis.org Wed Mar 15 13:48:50 2006 From: george at galis.org (George Georgalis) Date: Wed Mar 15 13:48:53 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] looking for mac-winscp In-Reply-To: <8A76B8A9-4B8D-41E7-AA1E-8CE4A9B56B3A@lesmuug.org> References: <20060315162945.GA12397@sta.duo> <8A76B8A9-4B8D-41E7-AA1E-8CE4A9B56B3A@lesmuug.org> Message-ID: <20060315184850.GC12397@sta.duo> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:27:43PM -0500, Isaac Levy wrote: >On Mar 15, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Brad Schonhorst wrote: > >>>So in a nutshell, winscp is a perfect solution but it doesn't run >>>on Mac, as far as I can tell. Is anybody using something similar >>>to get authenticated, browsable, gui file sharing? I'm happy to >>>use command line or the finder to access the files, but command >>>line scp is not enough, I need a mounted filesystem or virtually >>>that. >>> >>> >> >>Hey George- >> >>I am not sure I understand exactly what you are looking for but if >>its a GUI frontend to run on a mac for ssh/scp then fugu might be >>worth trying: >> >>http://rsug.itd.umich.edu/software/fugu/ >> >> >>-brad > >I'll second Fugu. works fine, I'll miss double clicking on pdf to "virtually open from remote" (winscp/finder) and having a local mount points (samba). it also is missing a rsync like feature of winscp, but it does the job. Thanks, // George -- George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator < http://galis.org/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george@galis.org From jschauma at netmeister.org Wed Mar 15 16:38:09 2006 From: jschauma at netmeister.org (Jan Schaumann) Date: Wed Mar 15 16:31:43 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup In-Reply-To: <20060306034123.GB22236@netmeister.org> References: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> <20060305222336.GA8126@netmeister.org> <2EDE8D2B-7E66-4207-B3A1-CCC08243589B@lesmuug.org> <20060306034123.GB22236@netmeister.org> Message-ID: <20060315213809.GA16321@netmeister.org> Jan Schaumann wrote: > So far I've gotten to ``install amanda on OS X, add host/disk to > config''. The ``done'' part is what usually proves to be the tricky > one. Still not quite there, but at least I have a working backup system. I've installed amanda from pkgsrc [1], and set the backup server to use tar(1) on this host instead of dump. So far so good. I started amandad from xinetd(8), and did a backup. So far so good. I had to reboot the machine, and amanda no longer listens. I don't know what exactly the magic is that Mac OS X wants me to perform, but apparently xinetd(8) is no longer starting the service which I added to /etc/xinetd.d/amanda. If I log in and kill -HUP xinetd, then it will work. Alright, so I think that I go and find out what the way is that Apple wants me to do these things. I hear and read about launchd(8). I create a amanda.plist [2] for launchd and place it into /Library/LaunchDaemons/. I 'launchctl load /Library/LaunchDaemons/amanda.plist'. I see it's listed via 'launchctl list'. I see it's listening via netstat(1). I think I'm golden. I reboot, and launchd did not start amanda. 'launchctl list' does show it, though. If I 'launchctl unload' it and then 'launchctl load' it again, everything's working. So... how do I get it to start at boot time? Anybody? -Jan [1] http://www.pkgsrc.org [2] Below: Label org.amanda.amanda OnDemand ProgramArguments /Volumes/pkgsrc/pkg/libexec/amandad ServiceDescription Amanda Backup Daemon Sockets Listeners SockNodeName 192.168.0.8 SockServiceName amanda SockType dgram UserName backup GroupName operator InitGroups inetdCompatibility Wait -- "When it's fall in New York, the air smells as if someone's been frying goats in it, and if you are keen to breathe the best plan is to open a window and stick your head in a building." -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://berdom.net/pipermail/macosx-unix/attachments/20060315/457534a5/attachment.bin From ike at lesmuug.org Wed Mar 15 17:18:11 2006 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Wed Mar 15 17:18:15 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup In-Reply-To: <20060315213809.GA16321@netmeister.org> References: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> <20060305222336.GA8126@netmeister.org> <2EDE8D2B-7E66-4207-B3A1-CCC08243589B@lesmuug.org> <20060306034123.GB22236@netmeister.org> <20060315213809.GA16321@netmeister.org> Message-ID: <8807660C-7C31-4B1C-B46C-42733031C2E9@lesmuug.org> Hi Jan, I'm a bit confused about what your asking, as I've forgotten a lot of the original post. Are you working purely with OSX machines here, or is there some NetBSD server you are backing up to? On Mar 15, 2006, at 4:38 PM, Jan Schaumann wrote: > Jan Schaumann wrote: > >> So far I've gotten to ``install amanda on OS X, add host/disk to >> config''. The ``done'' part is what usually proves to be the tricky >> one. > > Still not quite there, but at least I have a working backup system. > I've installed amanda from pkgsrc [1], On OSX or on some other platform? > and set the backup server to use > tar(1) on this host instead of dump. So far so good. Great- > > I started amandad from xinetd(8), and did a backup. So far so good. > > I had to reboot the machine, and amanda no longer listens. I don't > know > what exactly the magic is that Mac OS X wants me to perform, but > apparently xinetd(8) is no longer starting the service which I > added to > /etc/xinetd.d/amanda. Is that script OK? Are you using it along side the launchd stuff you mention below, or separately? > > If I log in and kill -HUP xinetd, then it will work. > > Alright, so I think that I go and find out what the way is that Apple > wants me to do these things. I hear and read about launchd(8). "Getting Started with launchd" http://developer.apple.com/macosx/launchd.html Man page for launchd(8) http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/ man8/launchd.8.html Man page for launchd.plist(5) http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/ man5/launchd.plist.5.html#//apple_ref/doc/man/5/launchd.plist -- To my knowledge, launchd is going to stay for the long-haul, and also in FreeBSD world, a number of core people are looking to make launchd the new starter service on FreeBSD (I think we'll see when FreeBSD 7 gets closer to REL, I understand some folks don't like the XML involved and want to stick to the ol' reliable rc subsystem.) With all that stated, it seems this is about as close to standardizing methodology as money is buying. > I > create a amanda.plist [2] for launchd and place it into > /Library/LaunchDaemons/. I 'launchctl load > /Library/LaunchDaemons/amanda.plist'. I see it's listed via > 'launchctl > list'. I see it's listening via netstat(1). I think I'm golden. > > I reboot, and launchd did not start amanda. 'launchctl list' does > show > it, though. If I 'launchctl unload' it and then 'launchctl load' it > again, everything's working. > > So... how do I get it to start at boot time? Anybody? > > -Jan I really think it's something in the start script you provided below- but since I'm not using amanda, and don't know anybody on list who is, I don't know what to tell you about where it's borking. Perhaps it's something as simple as a permissions issue? Or or perhasp some load-order issue? I'm comparing your file to something I know is working on a machine here: /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/ssh.plist to see if there's anything that sticks out to me- but they're too different, so I'm still stumped. -- So I guess I didn't really help any with this thread, except to go over some of the obvious stuff... Rocket- .ike > > > [1] http://www.pkgsrc.org > > [2] Below: > > > "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> > > > Label > org.amanda.amanda > OnDemand > > ProgramArguments > > /Volumes/pkgsrc/pkg/libexec/amandad > > ServiceDescription > Amanda Backup Daemon > Sockets > > Listeners > > SockNodeName > 192.168.0.8 > SockServiceName > amanda > SockType > dgram > > > UserName > backup > GroupName > operator > InitGroups > > inetdCompatibility > > Wait > > > > > > -- From ike at lesmuug.org Wed Mar 15 17:30:46 2006 From: ike at lesmuug.org (Isaac Levy) Date: Wed Mar 15 17:30:49 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup In-Reply-To: <8807660C-7C31-4B1C-B46C-42733031C2E9@lesmuug.org> References: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> <20060305222336.GA8126@netmeister.org> <2EDE8D2B-7E66-4207-B3A1-CCC08243589B@lesmuug.org> <20060306034123.GB22236@netmeister.org> <20060315213809.GA16321@netmeister.org> <8807660C-7C31-4B1C-B46C-42733031C2E9@lesmuug.org> Message-ID: <2487925F-4E10-4E3E-B039-E4627B025DAD@lesmuug.org> Oh! I *think* I found it, On Mar 15, 2006, at 5:18 PM, Isaac Levy wrote: > > I'm comparing your file to something I know is working on a machine > here: > /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/ssh.plist > to see if there's anything that sticks out to me- but they're too > different, so I'm still stumped. > > -- > So I guess I didn't really help any with this thread, except to go > over some of the obvious stuff... From the launchd.plist(5) man page: http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/ man5/launchd.plist.5.html#//apple_ref/doc/man/5/launchd.plist "OnDemand This optional key is used to control whether your job is launched based on demand or to be kept continuously running. The default is true." Your script uses this OnDemand key, other scripts I found that I know work (apple setup) do not use this key. -- Also, perhaps of use, I noted that smbd.plist uses: inetdCompatibility Wait "inetdCompatibility The presence of this key specifies that the daemon expects to be run as if it were launched from inetd(8). This flag is incompatible with the ServiceIPC key." -- If I were you I'd try hacking the startup script, copying directly from some similar daemon- smbd perhaps- and see how it goes from there... The man page, and options, are dizzying IMHO... Rocket- .ike > >> >> >> [1] http://www.pkgsrc.org >> >> [2] Below: >> >> >> > "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> >> >> >> Label >> org.amanda.amanda >> OnDemand >> >> ProgramArguments >> >> /Volumes/pkgsrc/pkg/libexec/amandad >> >> ServiceDescription >> Amanda Backup Daemon >> Sockets >> >> Listeners >> >> SockNodeName >> 192.168.0.8 >> SockServiceName >> amanda >> SockType >> dgram >> >> >> UserName >> backup >> GroupName >> operator >> InitGroups >> >> inetdCompatibility >> >> Wait >> >> >> >> >> >> -- From jschauma at netmeister.org Wed Mar 15 18:15:19 2006 From: jschauma at netmeister.org (Jan Schaumann) Date: Wed Mar 15 18:08:54 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup In-Reply-To: <8807660C-7C31-4B1C-B46C-42733031C2E9@lesmuug.org> References: <20060305155336.GA11890@netmeister.org> <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> <20060305222336.GA8126@netmeister.org> <2EDE8D2B-7E66-4207-B3A1-CCC08243589B@lesmuug.org> <20060306034123.GB22236@netmeister.org> <20060315213809.GA16321@netmeister.org> <8807660C-7C31-4B1C-B46C-42733031C2E9@lesmuug.org> Message-ID: <20060315231518.GA18454@netmeister.org> Isaac Levy wrote: > I'm a bit confused about what your asking, as I've forgotten a lot of > the original post. Heh, no problem. I had hoped the post itself would be sufficient to pose a question. The question ultimately was: why does launchd not automatically start my new service? (The fact that the service is amanda is rather tangential by now.) > Are you working purely with OSX machines here, or is there some > NetBSD server you are backing up to? The backup server is NetBSD, the OS X is just one of the machines that are being backed up. The way amanda works, you need to have the amanda client running on each of the machines you want to backup, so the amanda process can connect to it and start the backup. > > On Mar 15, 2006, at 4:38 PM, Jan Schaumann wrote: > >Still not quite there, but at least I have a working backup system. > >I've installed amanda from pkgsrc [1], > > On OSX or on some other platform? On OS X in this case. > >I had to reboot the machine, and amanda no longer listens. I don't > >know > >what exactly the magic is that Mac OS X wants me to perform, but > >apparently xinetd(8) is no longer starting the service which I > >added to > >/etc/xinetd.d/amanda. > > Is that script OK? Are you using it along side the launchd stuff you > mention below, or separately? I used to use it stand alone, no launchd involved. And it worked just fine, once I manually HUPped xinetd, but the problem was that it wouldn't automatically be launched at boot time, so I tried to give launchd a shot. > "Getting Started with launchd" > http://developer.apple.com/macosx/launchd.html > > Man page for launchd(8) > http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/ > man8/launchd.8.html > > Man page for launchd.plist(5) > http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/ > man5/launchd.plist.5.html#//apple_ref/doc/man/5/launchd.plist Yupp, read all those. > Perhaps it's something as simple as a permissions issue? Or or > perhasp some load-order issue? As best as I can tell, it seems to be a load-order issue. But then again, that's supposedly one of the things about launchd: you don't really get a decent launch order. I don't even know in what order it tries to start the services. I thought it might start them in alphabetical order, so I renamed the service to 'z-amanda.plist', so it would be started last. However, that didn't work. It still was started before some other services at boot time and didn't work. -Jan -- http://www.eff.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://berdom.net/pipermail/macosx-unix/attachments/20060315/1a9548f8/attachment.bin From jschauma at netmeister.org Wed Mar 15 18:20:15 2006 From: jschauma at netmeister.org (Jan Schaumann) Date: Wed Mar 15 18:13:49 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] amanda backup In-Reply-To: <2487925F-4E10-4E3E-B039-E4627B025DAD@lesmuug.org> References: <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> <20060305222336.GA8126@netmeister.org> <2EDE8D2B-7E66-4207-B3A1-CCC08243589B@lesmuug.org> <20060306034123.GB22236@netmeister.org> <20060315213809.GA16321@netmeister.org> <8807660C-7C31-4B1C-B46C-42733031C2E9@lesmuug.org> <2487925F-4E10-4E3E-B039-E4627B025DAD@lesmuug.org> Message-ID: <20060315232014.GB18454@netmeister.org> Isaac Levy wrote: > From the launchd.plist(5) man page: > > http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/ > man5/launchd.plist.5.html#//apple_ref/doc/man/5/launchd.plist > > > "OnDemand > This optional key is used to control whether your job is > launched based > on demand or to be kept continuously running. The default is > true." > > > Your script uses this OnDemand key, other scripts I found that I know > work (apple setup) do not use this key. Well, that's because the way I use it is actually the default. Some other scripts do use it to allow the service to run continually (such as cron or postfix) and others use it set to the default or leave it out to only start on demand (ssh, for example). But I did try it with and without having this key, which made no difference. > -- > Also, perhaps of use, I noted that smbd.plist uses: > > inetdCompatibility > > Wait > > > > "inetdCompatibility > The presence of this key specifies that the daemon expects to > be run as > if it were launched from inetd(8). This flag is incompatible > with the > ServiceIPC key." Right, which is why I added this to the amanda.plist. I'm quite sure that the plist itself, as is, is correct. It does work just fine when I manually 'launchctl load' it, after all. It just doesn't start automatically, *even though* it's actually loaded automatically. That is, after a fresh reboot, 'launchctl list' will show me that org.amanda.amanda is a service that is running, only it will not actually be running and nothing is listening on port 10080. > If I were you I'd try hacking the startup script, copying directly > from some similar daemon- smbd perhaps- and see how it goes from > there... That's exactly how I did come up with this plist. :-) > The man page, and options, are dizzying IMHO... Well, if they're accurate, then I think they're fine. But then, I've noticed that on OS X manual pages are not always entirely accurate. Or complete. Or necessarily existant. -Jan -- 'I have reached an age where my main purpose is not to receive messages.' --- Umberto Eco, quoted in the New Yorker -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://berdom.net/pipermail/macosx-unix/attachments/20060315/3794e1af/attachment.bin From jschauma at netmeister.org Thu Mar 16 13:54:58 2006 From: jschauma at netmeister.org (Jan Schaumann) Date: Thu Mar 16 23:18:41 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] launchd [was: amanda backup] In-Reply-To: <20060315232014.GB18454@netmeister.org> References: <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> <20060305222336.GA8126@netmeister.org> <2EDE8D2B-7E66-4207-B3A1-CCC08243589B@lesmuug.org> <20060306034123.GB22236@netmeister.org> <20060315213809.GA16321@netmeister.org> <8807660C-7C31-4B1C-B46C-42733031C2E9@lesmuug.org> <2487925F-4E10-4E3E-B039-E4627B025DAD@lesmuug.org> <20060315232014.GB18454@netmeister.org> Message-ID: <20060316185458.GC15635@netmeister.org> Jan Schaumann wrote: > I'm quite sure that the plist itself, as is, is correct. It does work > just fine when I manually 'launchctl load' it, after all. It just > doesn't start automatically, *even though* it's actually loaded > automatically. That is, after a fresh reboot, 'launchctl list' will > show me that org.amanda.amanda is a service that is running, only it > will not actually be running and nothing is listening on port 10080. I believe the problem is that the binary is located on a different Volume than the root Volume. So at boot time, whenever launchd actually starts all the services, the other Volume is not yet mounted. When I log in lateron, it is mounted and re-starting the service works. launchd does not seem to allow you to specify a specific order -- I believe that that is actually somehow argued to be an advantage of launchd. In NetBSD, I can specify which partitions need to be mounted before the system tries to start anything else, but I take it that under OS X that's not possible. Probably one more of those ``Oh, why would anybody want to do _that_? Let's make it impossible.'' Apple things. Prove me wrong. Please. :-) -Jan -- ``Californians have gotten to the point of being completely intolerant of non-diversity.'' -- Larry Wall -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://berdom.net/pipermail/macosx-unix/attachments/20060316/01cfabc2/attachment.bin From bob at redivi.com Thu Mar 16 20:29:13 2006 From: bob at redivi.com (Bob Ippolito) Date: Thu Mar 16 23:34:51 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] launchd [was: amanda backup] In-Reply-To: <20060316185458.GC15635@netmeister.org> References: <20060305162720.GB11890@netmeister.org> <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> <20060305222336.GA8126@netmeister.org> <2EDE8D2B-7E66-4207-B3A1-CCC08243589B@lesmuug.org> <20060306034123.GB22236@netmeister.org> <20060315213809.GA16321@netmeister.org> <8807660C-7C31-4B1C-B46C-42733031C2E9@lesmuug.org> <2487925F-4E10-4E3E-B039-E4627B025DAD@lesmuug.org> <20060315232014.GB18454@netmeister.org> <20060316185458.GC15635@netmeister.org> Message-ID: <4245994F-7ED9-4F17-AD15-C1F0A2490582@redivi.com> On Mar 16, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Jan Schaumann wrote: > Jan Schaumann wrote: > >> I'm quite sure that the plist itself, as is, is correct. It does >> work >> just fine when I manually 'launchctl load' it, after all. It just >> doesn't start automatically, *even though* it's actually loaded >> automatically. That is, after a fresh reboot, 'launchctl list' will >> show me that org.amanda.amanda is a service that is running, only it >> will not actually be running and nothing is listening on port 10080. > > I believe the problem is that the binary is located on a different > Volume than the root Volume. So at boot time, whenever launchd > actually > starts all the services, the other Volume is not yet mounted. When I > log in lateron, it is mounted and re-starting the service works. > > launchd does not seem to allow you to specify a specific order -- I > believe that that is actually somehow argued to be an advantage of > launchd. Instead of ordering, you specify dependencies via Uses/Requires/ Provides keys. This lets launchd calculate an order that makes sense, and do independent things in parallel. That's what makes it fast, because it doesn't have to do everything in serial in some specific order. > In NetBSD, I can specify which partitions need to be mounted before > the > system tries to start anything else, but I take it that under OS X > that's not possible. Probably one more of those ``Oh, why would > anybody > want to do _that_? Let's make it impossible.'' Apple things. > > Prove me wrong. Please. :-) Don't know this one. -bob From jschauma at netmeister.org Fri Mar 17 09:39:49 2006 From: jschauma at netmeister.org (Jan Schaumann) Date: Fri Mar 17 09:33:22 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] launchd [was: amanda backup] In-Reply-To: <4245994F-7ED9-4F17-AD15-C1F0A2490582@redivi.com> References: <6648D31D-AF96-4292-BE0A-EFCB7417062A@lesmuug.org> <20060305222336.GA8126@netmeister.org> <2EDE8D2B-7E66-4207-B3A1-CCC08243589B@lesmuug.org> <20060306034123.GB22236@netmeister.org> <20060315213809.GA16321@netmeister.org> <8807660C-7C31-4B1C-B46C-42733031C2E9@lesmuug.org> <2487925F-4E10-4E3E-B039-E4627B025DAD@lesmuug.org> <20060315232014.GB18454@netmeister.org> <20060316185458.GC15635@netmeister.org> <4245994F-7ED9-4F17-AD15-C1F0A2490582@redivi.com> Message-ID: <20060317143949.GA3679@netmeister.org> Bob Ippolito wrote: > > On Mar 16, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Jan Schaumann wrote: > >launchd does not seem to allow you to specify a specific order -- I > >believe that that is actually somehow argued to be an advantage of > >launchd. > > Instead of ordering, you specify dependencies via Uses/Requires/ > Provides keys. Interesting. That's a useful thing, which I'm used to from NetBSD's rc system. Where is this documented? (Doesn't seem to be in launchd.plist(5), and none of the existing files in /System/Library/LaunchDaemons has an example.) -Jan P.S.: FWIW, I added an entry to root's crontab to unload and reload the amanda launchd plist via '@reboot'. Since cron kicks is later, after the volumes have been mounted, this actually works, but it's obviously a hack. -- chown -R us:enemy your_base -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 186 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://berdom.net/pipermail/macosx-unix/attachments/20060317/e70b7f65/attachment.bin From george at galis.org Wed Mar 22 19:55:47 2006 From: george at galis.org (George Georgalis) Date: Wed Mar 22 19:55:55 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] LAMP and Asterisk employee needed Message-ID: <20060323005547.GD2474@sta.duo> Subject: [asterisk-biz] LAMP and Asterisk employee needed From: Robert Wolpov Reply-To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:19:08 -0500 To: asterisk-biz@lists.digium.com X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Return-Path: asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com List-Id: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion We are growing and looking to hire an operations guru with the following profile: Technologies: Linux Apache MySQL PHP Asterisk Skills: Network operations Network monitoring Some development work Testing Telecom vendor management Location: New York City area Timing: Immediate We are looking for a full time employee. We will consider a contract arrangement with the expectation of a move to full time if it goes well. This is an exciting opportunity to join a profitable and quickly growing VoIP service provider. Please send me your resume and contact information if you are interested. If you are not interested but know someone who might be, please feel free to forward this message on. Thanks in advance! Regards, Rob Wolpov rob@junctionnetworks.com 215-701-3050 ext. 7002 From george at galis.org Thu Mar 30 16:46:55 2006 From: george at galis.org (George Georgalis) Date: Thu Mar 30 16:47:04 2006 Subject: [macosx-unix] laptop for sale... Message-ID: <20060330214655.GA7099@sta.duo> Hi Folks, Cannot make it to meeting tonight. but was wondering, how does one go about selling a PowerBook? Machine Name: PowerBook G4 15" Machine Model: PowerBook5,6 CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (1.2) Number Of CPUs: 1 CPU Speed: 1.67 GHz L2 Cache (per CPU): 512 KB Memory: 1 GB Bus Speed: 167 MHz It is in near new condition, with 0.9 of 3 years used on transferable Apple warranty. My new employer needs to own my system, so they will be buying me a new one. :-) // George -- George Georgalis, systems architect, administrator < http://galis.org/ cell:646-331-2027 mailto:george@galis.org